| | | | Its easier to track moving items if they are collinear with their direction
of motion Todd S. Horowitz, Jeremy M. Wolfe, & Jennifer S. DiMase How can the visual system track multiple moving objects through time?
We propose that attending to trajectories is facilitated by mechanisms similar
to the association fields proposed for contour extraction (e.g. Field, Hayes,
& Hess, 1993 Vision Research 33, 173-93). Here we investigate one prediction
of this spatiotemporal association field hypothesis: objects aligned with
their heading should generate stronger forward associations and better tracking
than stimuli whose motion is orthogonal to their orientation. Stimuli were gabor patches (s.f. = .5 cycles/°) on a grey background.
There were ten items on each trial. Five items were cued at the start of
the trial, and five observers tracked them for ten seconds. Items bounced
off display edges and each other. Velocity varied inversely with distance
to other items. In separate blocks, items were oriented either collinear
or orthogonal to their headings. When motion ceased, observers identified
the cued items. As predicted, accuracy (mean; sem) was significantly higher (t(5) = 5.82,
p < .005) in the collinear condition (74.7%; 3.9%) than in orthogonal
condition (67.1%; 2.7%). Spatiotemporal association fields may form the basis for a theory of trajectory
prediction in multielement visual tracking. | |